Login   /  Register

Updated At: Jul 25, 2021 07:16 AM (IST)

Reflections on Mughal Art & Culture Edited by Roda Ahluwalia. Niyogi Books. Pages 352. Rs 3,000.

Book Title: Reflections on Mughal Art & Culture

It is not easy to write anything on Mughal painting without recalling Ananda Coomaraswamy’s elegant, finely-cut words. Close to a hundred years ago, he began an essay by saying: “Mughal art is secular, intent upon the present moment, and profoundly interested in individuality …It is dramatic rather than static; young, fond of experiment, and ready to assimilate…” He went on in the same strain, returning to the theme while distinguishing the spirit of Mughal painting from that of Rajput painting, which, in his view, was “often essentially mystic in its suggestion of the infinite significance of the most homely events …inconceivable apart from the life it reflects”. Not all of what he wrote stands true today, for so much more has been discovered and published since, but nothing that he said can be ignored with a light wave of the hand.

Some thoughts needed to be exchanged, all the same — even if the Mughal period has not exactly been the flavour of the season in our land for some years now, and at the famed Cama Institute in Mumbai in 2017, a seminar on ‘Mughal Art and Culture’ was held. The event was ‘run’ by Roda Ahluwalia, who has now edited this valuable and finely produced volume, putting together all the papers that were presented at the conference. “The premise of the seminar,” as she writes in her introduction, “was to express ideas already germinating in scholarly minds, therefore a broad canvas of subject matter was offered across the Mughal spectrum, to enable participants to write on almost any subject they wished to research.” Seminars on academic themes, one needs to remind oneself, are a little like ‘mushairas’ — those wonderful poetic meets in the Urdu tradition — in which the convention used to be to keep a candle lit on the stage on which the participants sat, and was kept moving, being placed in front of one poet after another, as each one’s turn came. The audience kept listening with rapt attention.

To this scholarly meet, participants had come from near and far — from England and Europe, from the US and, of course, from India — each sharing thoughts they had long been researching. The range is truly wide, and keeps expanding, like concentric rings formed by a dropped stone on still waters. Kavita Singh opens with ruminations on Mughal Chronicles, rich as they are in words and images, ‘and the gaps in-between’; Mika Natif draws attention to the all but rarely seen portraits of Mughal women in illustrated histories; Roda herself focuses on a relatively little-known master, Nanha; Subhash Parihar urges one to look at Mughal murals that find depiction in Mughal miniatures and manuscripts. Ursula Sims Williams lets one into the Imperial Library of the Mughals, sharing inscriptions, some of them in the Emperors’ own hands, and fine seals; Cathy Asher explores Hindu temples in Mughal India that were a part of our multi-cultural history; Laura Parodi analyses the Mughal gardens while discussing their antecedents; Susan Stronge discusses lapidary arts in Mughal India when hard-stone materials were imparted incredible sheen and form; Anamika Pathak brings in other decorative art objects in her essay; Vivek Gupta discusses, using textiles, and a little-known poem, how attribution of an object to a place has a bearing on its entire meaning.

The rings expand in the last three essays which introduce different perspectives. Gulru Necipoglu speaks of transregional connections between three great empires: Ottoman, Safavid and Mughal; Sheila Canby examines in detail the Shahnama of Shah Tahmasp and its impact on Mughal painting, beginning with that iconic and much debated work, ‘The Princes of the House of Timur’; and Sunil Sharma, drawing upon comparisons across Mughal, Safavid and Ottoman literary and visual cultures, focuses on the ‘Indian Woman in a Persianate World’.

If all this reads like a Table of Contents — which it is, in some manner — it is intended to be so, for it constitutes an invitation to explore. What the reader is bound to find inside is fare that is varied and subtle and rich.

A note at the end. The Bibliography appended to the essays is a delight in itself, running as it does into close to 20 densely packed pages (even if only two of my own writings get cited, ignoring at least another three).

What do you think? (Share your feedback)

The Tribune, now published from Chandigarh, started publication on February 2, 1881, in Lahore (now in Pakistan). It was started by Sardar Dyal Singh Majithia, a public-spirited philanthropist, and is run by a trust comprising four eminent persons as trustees.

The Tribune, the largest selling English daily in North India, publishes news and views without any bias or prejudice of any kind. Restraint and moderation, rather than agitational language and partisanship, are the hallmarks of the paper. It is an independent newspaper in the real sense of the term.

The Tribune has two sister publications, Punjabi Tribune (in Punjabi) and Dainik Tribune (in Hindi).

Remembering Sardar Dyal Singh Majithia

Designed and Developed by: Grazitti Interactive